Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905172›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

Effects of proactive control and reward incentives on the inhibition of sequentially linked motor actions.

Chris M Dodds, Lidia Falcon-Hernandez, Jessica Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chris M DoddsDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Building, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. c.m.dodds@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-2240
Lidia Falcon-HernandezDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Building, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Jessica WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Building, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effects of proactive control on response inhibition have previously been studied using tasks such as the stop signal task in which participants are required to inhibit a single, isolated motor response. However, skilled, coordinated behavior often involves the execution of learned sequences of motor actions in which each action triggers the next with a degree of automaticity. Across three experiments, we investigated the effects of proactive control and reward incentives on the frequency of errors in a motor sequence learning task that requires inhibition of sequentially triggered motor actions. We observed graded effects of proactive control on inhibition success. Although cues indicating an upcoming stop trial led to a marked reduction in the frequency of slips-of-action, errors continued to occur despite significant cue-induced proactive slowing. When cues were combined with incentives for successful stopping, proactive control increased further, with an additional reduction in frequency of slips-of-action. These findings show that the effectiveness of proactive control in suppressing automatically triggered actions within learned sequences is jointly determined by the depth of proactive slowing and the motivational context.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalMotivationProactive InhibitionPsychomotor PerformanceRewardCuesFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42905172
PMCPMC13687150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.