ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Novel approaches to target prostate cancer stem cells driving therapy resistance and cancer progression.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains one of the most common malignancies in men, and its global burden continues to rise. Although androgen deprivation therapy and other standard treatments can provide substantial disease control, advanced tumors may progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer, which is associated with poor outcomes. Preclinical and translational evidence implicates prostate cancer stem-like cells (PCSCs) in treatment persistence, progression, and relapse, without establishing them as the sole cause of resistance in patients. PCSC-associated states share functional traits with normal stem cells, including self-renewal and survival under stress; reduced androgen receptor activity occurs in some, but not all, stem-like populations. Their behavior is influenced by the genomic context, including PTEN loss, TP53/RB1 alterations, SPOP mutations, and TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangements, as well as hypoxia, stromal interactions, and inflammatory signaling. These alterations are not specific markers of PCSC identity. Multiple interconnected pathways, notably PI3K/AKT/mTOR, RAS/MAPK, Hedgehog, Wnt/β-catenin, Hippo, JAK/STAT, Notch, EGFR, and hypoxia-driven HIF signaling, provide candidate therapeutic targets. Additional strategies include modifying the microenvironment to suppress epithelial-to-mesenchymal plasticity, restoring tumor-suppressive microRNAs, and developing checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and CAR-T cells against relevant tumor-associated antigens. Most PCSC-specific evidence remains experimental, even when a pathway-directed agent has clinical activity or regulatory approval in a molecularly selected prostate cancer population. Clinical tumor responses do not by themselves demonstrate selective PCSC depletion. This narrative review distinguishes mechanistic findings from clinical outcomes and considers limitations involving marker specificity, model selection, drug delivery, toxicity, and therapeutic escape. Functionally validated biomarkers and appropriately designed combination trials are needed to determine whether targeting PCSC-associated states can improve durable disease control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42905164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.