Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905048›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2026

Attitudes of cancer patients toward ctDNA-based liquid biopsy for follow-up.

Siddharth Chhajlani, Laura Mariën, Caro De Weerdt, Sanne Wouters, Laure-Anne Teuwen, Hans Prenen, Katleen Janssens, Timon Vandamme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siddharth ChhajlaniDepartment of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6291-0371
Laura MariënCenter of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Caro De WeerdtDepartment of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Sanne WoutersDepartment of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Laure-Anne TeuwenDepartment of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Hans PrenenDepartment of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Katleen JanssensCenter of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Timon VandammeDepartment of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-5305

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1803723NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S94923NKom op tegen Kanker KotK_UZA/2023/13330Stichting Tegen Kanker
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA-based liquid biopsy is increasingly integrated into cancer care, particularly for detecting minimal residual disease, yet patient perspectives remain poorly understood. This single-center, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study assessed recall, knowledge, and attitudes toward liquid biopsy and circulating tumor DNA among 195 patients (median age 65 years; 63% female) undergoing cancer treatment or follow-up, supplemented by focus groups. Although 65% reported prior liquid biopsy, this was confirmed in only 44%, and only 10% had heard of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Correct recall and knowledge on ctDNA were higher among patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and those with postgraduate education. In hypothetical scenarios assuming proven clinical validity and utility, 62-80% supported liquid biopsy-guided clinical action, 74% were comfortable with liquid biopsy replacing tissue biopsy, and 79% accepted its use to guide adjuvant treatment. Most patients anticipated reassurance rather than stress, and 85% expected improved quality of life with home- or general practitioner-based blood sampling. Overall, patients showed high acceptance of clinically actionable liquid biopsy use, driven by trust and perceived clinical benefit.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAliquid biopsypatient perspectivesshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID42905048
PMCPMC13685910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.