ArticleMolecular oncology2026
Attitudes of cancer patients toward ctDNA-based liquid biopsy for follow-up.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA-based liquid biopsy is increasingly integrated into cancer care, particularly for detecting minimal residual disease, yet patient perspectives remain poorly understood. This single-center, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study assessed recall, knowledge, and attitudes toward liquid biopsy and circulating tumor DNA among 195 patients (median age 65 years; 63% female) undergoing cancer treatment or follow-up, supplemented by focus groups. Although 65% reported prior liquid biopsy, this was confirmed in only 44%, and only 10% had heard of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Correct recall and knowledge on ctDNA were higher among patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and those with postgraduate education. In hypothetical scenarios assuming proven clinical validity and utility, 62-80% supported liquid biopsy-guided clinical action, 74% were comfortable with liquid biopsy replacing tissue biopsy, and 79% accepted its use to guide adjuvant treatment. Most patients anticipated reassurance rather than stress, and 85% expected improved quality of life with home- or general practitioner-based blood sampling. Overall, patients showed high acceptance of clinically actionable liquid biopsy use, driven by trust and perceived clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.