Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42905043›Full record

ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026

Endodontic Misconceptions Among Dental Patients: Prevalence and Association with Tooth Extraction Preference.

Alaa Saud Aloufi, Hatim Abdulqader Qurban, Hosam Aabed Alofi, Mustafa Mohammed Alqazanli, Heba Saud Albalawi, Reem Husain Alhammad, Joud Mohamed Alotaibi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alaa Saud Aloufi
Hatim Abdulqader Qurban
Hosam Aabed Alofi
Mustafa Mohammed Alqazanli
Heba Saud Albalawi
Reem Husain Alhammad
Joud Mohamed Alotaibi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePart of proper oral health care is recognising and correcting dental myths and misconceptions that often discourage patients from seeking proper treatment decisions. Although general dental myths are well studied, little is known about the prevalence of specific endodontic misconceptions, especially those related to the effects of root canal treatment (RCT) on systemic health and their correlation with patients' preference for extraction over RCT. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of endodontic myths among adult dental patients and to explore potential associations with demographic variables and with a preference for tooth extraction over RCT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A self-administered paper questionnaire was distributed in person at 11 dental hospitals and private clinics in Almadinah Almunawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Participants in the study included adults without cognitive impairments. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic data, history of previous RCT, agreement with 10 endodontic myths, and preference for extraction over RCT. To ensure understanding and clarity of the questionnaire, a pilot test was carried out. The data were then analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and multivariable logistic regression tests using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The p value was set at p ≤ 0.05.

resultsA total of 463 participants completed the questionnaire. The most commonly endorsed myths were that root canal treatment can only be done in multiple visits (73.0%), that antibiotics are necessary during treatment (68.5%), and that root-canal-treated teeth become weak and brittle (63.1%). Almost a third of the patients (30.9%) believed that a root-canal-treated tooth remains infected; however, myths about systemic diseases were less common; these include beliefs that RCT causes cancer (6.3%), cardiovascular disease or heart attacks (10.8%), or chronic illnesses (14.3%). Older participants, lower educational levels and prior RCT experience showed significant endorsement of specific misconceptions (p 0.05). Bivariate analyses revealed that several misconceptions were significantly associated with a greater preference for tooth extraction, specifically those related to systemic health. Patients who believed that root canal treatment (RCT) causes cancer, that RCT-treated teeth remain infected and that all root-canal-treated teeth should be extracted were more likely to prefer extraction than those who did not hold these beliefs (all p 0.05).

conclusionEndodontic myths were common among patients in Almadinah Almunawara. Misconceptions concerning systemic health effects, persistence of infection, and a perceived link between RCT and cancer were associated with a preference for tooth extraction over RCT. Age, educational level, and no previous RCT experience were associated with endorsement of specific misconceptions. Targeted public education and effective dentist-patient communication may help correct these misconceptions, improve acceptance of evidence-based endodontic care, and support preservation of natural dentition.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient PreferenceRoot Canal TherapyTooth ExtractionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultendodonticsmythsroot canal therapytooth extraction

Identifiers

PMID42905043
PMCPMC13688091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.