ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Structuring the World: Statistical Learning From the Top and From the Bottom.
Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Statistical learning is the brain's primary strategy for transforming continuous, noisy, and ambiguous sensory inputs into structured internal representations. This process is studied through a diverse array of perspectives spanning different species, sensory systems, levels of analysis, and methodological frameworks. Here, we present four such perspectives. Two of them approach the problem from the bottom, examining the neural substrates of the biological implementation. The first line describes implicit contextual learning in the rodent auditory midbrain, showing how neuronal frequency tuning adapts to predictable statistical regularities over days. The second line shows that explicit knowledge modulates belief updating as early as the human auditory midbrain and thalamus, revealing a functionally specialized subcortical inferential hierarchy. The other two research lines approach it from the top, examining the computations the brain performs. The third line compares statistical computations across species and human development, uncovering fundamental differences in probabilistic chunking strategies between honeybees, human infants, and adults. The fourth line provides a computational framework for continual learning in which experience is organized into structured internal models through ongoing contextual inference. We then examine what each line can contribute to the others. We argue that, if the brain evolved statistical learning under pressure to behave optimally, this optimality must have been achieved globally through the constraints and synergies that emerge from the interplay between subsystems and levels of analysis. The neuronal mechanisms implementing a computation are shaped by the computation they perform, while that computation is itself constrained by the available physiology: a mutual dependence that can only be understood by bridging across perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.