Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42904866›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2026

Genomic Landscape Underlying Biofilm Formation Diversity in Nakaseomyces glabratus Clinical Isolates.

Inês Vieira Costa, Maria Zolotareva, Mafalda Cavalheiro, Dalila Mil-Homens, Isabel M Miranda, Kaname Sasamoto, Arsénio Fialho, Acácio G Rodrigues, Hiroji Chibana, Miguel Cacho Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Inês Vieira CostaDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Maria ZolotarevaDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mafalda CavalheiroDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Dalila Mil-HomensDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Isabel M MirandaMISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, Portugal.
Kaname SasamotoMedical Mycology Research Center (MMRC), Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Arsénio FialhoDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Acácio G RodriguesMISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, Portugal.
Hiroji ChibanaMedical Mycology Research Center (MMRC), Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Miguel Cacho TeixeiraDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5676-6174

Funding

European Commission OSCARS 101129751Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/04565/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation is a key determinant of persistence and pathogenicity in fungal infections, yet the genetic basis underlying its variability among clinical isolates remains poorly understood. In this study, a collection of 95 N. glabratus clinical isolates was analyzed in terms of biofilm formation capacity, revealing large phenotypic diversity. Interestingly, urinary tract associated isolates were found to produce, on average, twice as much biofilm as the remaining isolates. A more in-depth analysis was carried out focusing on a selection of three of the lowest biofilm producing and four of the highest biofilm producing isolates. Higher total biofilm mass was found to consistently correlate with higher metabolic activity and carbohydrate extracellular matrix content, while no correlation with virulence against the Galleria mellonella infection model could be detected. Whole-genome sequencing of these high and low biofilm producing strains led to a list of 184 genes whose mutation may underlie biofilm formation variability. Deletion of 24 of these genes, identified BST1, EST3, LSM7, AMS1 and ZCF21 as previously uncharacterized contributors to biofilm formation, whose disruption results in a measurable reduction in biofilm biomass. Altogether, the obtained knowledge suggests within-host positive selection in the urinary tract, for N. glabratus specialization towards biofilm growth. The identification of new effectors of biofilm formation is consistent with the existence of a multi-layered network that connects transcriptional regulation and cell surface architecture in biofilm development.

Indexed as

BiofilmsGenetic VariationMycosesAnimalsHumansUrinary Tract InfectionsWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42904866
PMCPMC13685526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.