Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42904774›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

A mechanistic theory of planning in prefrontal cortex.

Kristopher T Jensen, Peter T Doohan, Mathias Sablé-Meyer, Sandra Reinert, Alon Boaz Baram, Maneesh Sahani, Thomas Akam, Timothy E Behrens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristopher T JensenSainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-5572
Peter T DoohanOxford Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-7354
Mathias Sablé-MeyerSainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0844-0775
Sandra ReinertSainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4302-7433
Alon Boaz BaramOxford Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-137X
Maneesh SahaniGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-3341
Thomas AkamSainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1810-0494
Timothy E BehrensSainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-1177

Funding

European Molecular Biology Organization ALTF 651-2023Gatsby Charitable Foundation GAT4058Gatsby Charitable Foundation Sainsbury Wellcome Centre's core GAT3755Gatsby Charitable Foundation The Gatsby Initiative for Brain Development and Psychiatry GAT3955Human Frontier Science Program 10.52044/HFSP.LT00402024-L.pc.gr.195051Royal Society FDF\S2\251056Simons Foundation SCGB543039Wellcome Trust 10.35802/219525Wellcome Trust 10.35802/225926Wellcome Trust Sainsbury Wellcome Centre's core 219627/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planning is critical for adaptive behaviour in a changing world, because it lets us anticipate the future and adjust our actions accordingly. While prefrontal cortex is crucial for this process, it remains unknown how planning is implemented in neural circuits. Prefrontal representations were recently discovered in simpler sequence memory tasks, where different populations of neurons represent different future time points. We demonstrate that combining such representations with the ubiquitous principle of neural attractor dynamics allows circuits to solve much richer problems, including planning. This is achieved by embedding the environment structure directly in synaptic connections to implement an attractor network that infers desirable futures. The resulting 'spacetime attractor' excels at planning in challenging tasks known to depend on the prefrontal cortex. Recurrent neural networks trained by gradient descent on such tasks learn a solution that precisely recapitulates the spacetime attractor - in representation, in dynamics, and in connectivity. Analyses of networks trained across different environment structures reveal a generalisation mechanism that rapidly reconfigures the world model used for planning, without the need for synaptic plasticity. The spacetime attractor is a testable mechanistic theory of planning. If true, it would provide a path towards detailed mechanistic understanding of how prefrontal cortex structures adaptive behaviour.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNerve NetPrefrontal CortexAnimalsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsRecurrent Neural Networksattractor dynamicsneurosciencenoneplanningprefrontal cortexrecurrent neural networks

Identifiers

PMID42904774
PMCPMC13686619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.