ArticleHealth promotion international2026
What is public health advocacy? Australasian practitioner perspectives on defining the field and identifying effective practice and required competencies.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public health advocacy is a core function of public health practice, yet it remains underexamined, with limited consensus on its definition, effective strategies, and required competencies. This study explored public health advocacy practice among Australasian advocates, examining how advocacy is defined, which strategies are perceived as effective, and the competencies required for practice. Public health advocates completed an online survey between December 2024 and April 2025. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. A total of 101 advocates completed the survey. Public health advocacy was commonly defined as an intentional, outcomes-focused practice that uses strategic actions to influence policy and practice to improve population health. Relationship building (59%), influencing decision makers (57%), and media use (46%) were identified as the most effective strategies. Reported barriers included inadequate organizational resourcing (funding 63%, time 61%, personnel 47%), limited access to decision makers (56%), organizational concerns about repercussions (39%), low priority (32%), and insufficient training (32%). Required competencies included contextual understanding of the health issue, policymaking literacy, knowledge of advocacy methods, and skills in communication, collaboration, research, and media engagement. Australasian advocates hold broadly consistent views of public health advocacy and identify key competencies and effective strategies. However, barriers related to capacity, organizational support, and evaluation processes continue to constrain practice. Strengthening workforce capability requires targeted education and training, greater organizational prioritization and resourcing of advocacy, and the development of strong relational networks with stakeholders and decision makers to enhance advocacy effectiveness. These findings have relevance beyond Australasia, particularly in comparable high-income democratic countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.