ArticleRoyal Society open science2026
Preferences for pitch sequence complexity are consistent with an inverted U-shape in humans and parrots.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A well-established inverted U-shape relationship links stimulus complexity and human music preference, with preferences peaking at intermediate levels. We investigated whether preference for intermediate complexity is unique to humans or shared with other species. We compared the acoustic preferences of humans and budgerigars, a species known for their vocal learning and pattern recognition abilities, using a three-option place preference paradigm. Participants were presented with choices between stimuli of different, computationally defined complexity: pitch sequences with tones arranged either randomly (high complexity), repeating patterns with changes (medium) or fully repetitive patterns (low). Our results demonstrate that, without specific goals or external rewards, both humans and budgerigars spontaneously exhibit a nonlinear (intermediate) preference profile, indicating a pattern consistent with an inverted U-shape relationship. Because a U-shape relationship may reflect a strategy to seek informative sources maximally useful for learning-that is, for building and refining internal models of the environment-this preference in the acoustic domain may support vocal learning. However, further testing could determine whether it also exists in vocal non-learning species. Because vertebrates show inverted U-shape responses in a variety of non-auditory contexts, our findings may stem from general processes, but potentially depend on vocal learning to translate to acoustic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.