ArticleRoyal Society open science2026
Have you really seen this illusory face before? Illusory faces bias recognition memory reports.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual memory is known to be influenced by objective image properties, including image size and contrast, as well as visual category. However, the influence of illusory perceptual experience on memory remains less understood. Here we investigated whether face pareidolia, a robust illusory phenomenon where certain stimuli elicit a face-like percept despite not being real faces, influences memory. While we assumed illusory faces would be remembered better than matched control images since they are surprising, interesting, draw more attention and may be associated with longer observation times, old-new recognition memory sensitivity was not consistently influenced by the face illusion. Surprisingly, decision criterion was more liberal for illusory faces than for other categories, and this effect scaled with illusory strength such that participants were more likely to report having seen illusory faces for stronger illusory face percepts. In a two-alternative-forced-choice recognition memory paradigm that minimizes criterion influence, we found that the tendency to report having seen illusory faces is present even for unseen images. Further analyses, involving confidence ratings indicated our findings probably reflect a heightened sense of familiarity for illusory faces and not genuine false memory. Our results suggest that during retrieval, illusory faces influence decisions independently of the actual memory trace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.