ArticleRoyal Society open science2026
Natural recovery and gaming disorder: a case series.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conceptualizations of recovery in gaming disorder (GD) remain relatively underdeveloped. While remission without formal treatment appears common in longitudinal data, the mechanisms through which it occurs have received little systematic attention. In contrast, natural recovery-the resolution of addictive problems without formal treatment-is well documented in substance and gambling research, where it has prompted broader reconceptualizations of how and where recovery unfolds. Using longitudinal qualitative data from Finland, Slovakia and South Korea, this case series examines how individuals who had previously experienced self-identified gaming-related problems reached recovery without successful intervention explicitly targeting their gaming behaviour. Six recurring recovery pathways were identified: axiological shift, social enforcement, gradual regulation, reflexive transformation, healing comorbidity and environmental transformation. Rather than centring on abstinence or direct symptom elimination, recovery emerged through reconfigurations of life structure, social roles and personal value hierarchies. In most cases, gaming did not disappear but was repositioned within a broader ecology of responsibilities and relationships. These findings suggest that natural recovery in GD may be better understood as a contextual and relational reconfiguration rather than solely as symptom reduction. The pathways identified here provide a conceptual stepping stone towards more comprehensive frameworks for understanding the recovery process in GD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.