ArticleRoyal Society open science2026
Modularity without convergence: integrated evolution of the salamander autopodium.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morphological modularity is known to favour evolutionary diversification by enabling different body regions to vary in response to functional and ecological demands. Despite their remarkable diversity in limb morphology and ecology, amphibians-and salamanders in particular-remain significantly under-represented in empirical tests of modularity. Using geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods, we investigate patterns of shape variation, integration and modularity in the salamander autopodium. We first validated a landmark-based method to outline foot shape, demonstrating that image orientation does not affect shape analyses and that species can be reliably distinguished. We then applied this approach to a larger comparative dataset encompassing 149 salamander taxa across major lineages and ecological strategies. Our findings demonstrate that the salamander autopodium is functionally modular: the distal region (digits and interdigital region) shows more evolutionary lability than the proximal pes, while remaining integrated within a coordinated evolutionary system. Furthermore, the combinations of allometric, ecological and life-history factors account for a small but significant percentage of shape variation, with a low evolutionary signal in foot shape. Our results suggest that modular organization of the salamander foot may allow for morphological variation while still being limited by a common evolutionary and developmental history. By focusing on an understudied group and morphological system, this study provides new insight on how modularity influences limb evolution in tetrapods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.