ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2026
Developing an Open Multi-Domain Assessment Battery Using Laboratory Tasks for Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent years have seen growing interest in the use of randomized designs to evaluate the impacts of interventions on early child development in low- and middle-income countries. Measuring these impacts requires assessments that can track development prior to school entry in settings that are often noisy and outdoors. Drawing from research in developmental cognitive science, we created an open multi-domain assessment battery for testing children in low- and middle-income countries consisting of tasks based on experimental paradigms used in laboratory settings. These tasks were designed to target abilities that emerge across cultures early in life and predict later performance on related skills in adulthood. This battery was administered to 1435 Ghanaian children whose parent previously took part in a randomized controlled field experiment on the impacts of secondary education on their children's development, measuring performance on tasks at ages 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, and 7.5 years. Starting at age 3.5, children's responses to the tasks were internally consistent and above chance, with overall test results predictive of later performance. There was strong evidence of validity both for tasks in numeracy and spatial reasoning, which were designed to tap into culturally invariant cognitive capacities, as well as those in language and executive functioning, which required more context-specific adaptation. In contrast, there was little evidence of validity in infant tasks or tasks focused on intuitive physics or mental state reasoning. Nevertheless, our results suggest that our approach to assessment design is effective at producing tasks that are internally consistent and sensitive to individual differences within cohort. By making our testing materials and data freely accessible, we hope to provide a foundation for the development of tools for studying cognitive development in field settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.