Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42904249›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2026

Pragmatics and Social Cognition in Learning and Remembering Words.

Katherine Trice, Dionysia Saratsli, Anna Papafragou, Zhenghan Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine TriceDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-5133
Dionysia SaratsliDepartment of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, University of Delaware.
Anna PapafragouDepartment of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.
Zhenghan QiDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both children and adults can use sophisticated pragmatic inferences to acquire word meanings. An intriguing hypothesis is that words actively acquired via pragmatic inference (as opposed to simpler and more direct word-to-world mapping) might be better retained over time. On this hypothesis, to the extent that socio-cognitive skills support pragmatic computation, such socio-cognitive skills should also support inferentially-driven word learning outcomes. Alternatively, when word-to-world mapping is learned more directly, certainty during encoding might lead to more robust memory outcome. In the current study, we compared adults' immediate attainment and later retention of novel word meanings acquired through either direct mapping or pragmatic inference. We found that pragmatic inference facilitated the retention of novel words compared to direct mapping (Experiment 1). Moreover, better socio-cognitive skills were associated with better retention specifically for meanings that were inferred but not for meanings acquired through direct mapping (Experiment 1). Furthermore, when a social cognition task was performed before word learning, the advantage of pragmatic inference for meaning retention was diminished. This effect on word meaning retention was not seen when an inhibitory control task with similar attention demand was performed before word learning (Experiment 2). In conclusion, pragmatic processes supported by social cognition play a facilitatory role in adults' word meaning retention.

Indexed as

individual differencesmemorypragmaticssocial cognitionword learning

Identifiers

PMID42904249
PMCPMC13682635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.