ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Effects of sensorimotor training on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy-related outcomes in adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of sensorimotor training (SMT)-based interventions on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and related outcomes in adults with cancer. Methods: Eleven bibliographic databases and two trial registries were searched from inception to 30 March 2026. Risk of bias was assessed for each outcome using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Meta-analyses used a random-effects model to pool post-intervention data as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials were included, with 548 participants randomized to eligible comparison groups; seven contributed quantitative data. Compared with control conditions, SMT-based interventions were associated with better CIPN patient-reported outcomes (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.18-0.89), clinician-reported outcomes (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.08-0.92), quality of life (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.34-0.94), balance function (SMD = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.43-1.15), and lower-limb muscle strength (SMD = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.30-1.04). Interaction tests did not identify statistically significant subgroup differences between SMT alone and combined programs; however, the small number of studies precluded conclusions about comparative or incremental benefit. The certainty of evidence was low for all assessed outcomes. Conclusions: SMT-based interventions may improve CIPN symptoms and related outcomes, but the evidence is limited by small study numbers, risk of bias, heterogeneous populations and protocols, and low certainty. Current evidence is insufficient to determine whether effects differ according to baseline CIPN status or whether adding aerobic and resistance training provides incremental benefit. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024615574).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.