ReviewCentral European journal of urology2026
Dual-energy single-probe lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Central European journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Advances in laser technology have rendered laser lithotripsy an attractive option for lithotripsy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, limitations such as lower ablation rates and significant stone retropulsion have been noted, particularly in larger or harder stones. Trilogy is an emerging lithotrite that combines electromagnetic ballistic and ultrasonic energy with integrated suction in a single probe. This design offers theoretical advantages in stone fragmentation speed and debris clearance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Trilogy vs laser lithotripsy in PCNL. Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies that compared the efficacy and safety of the Trilogy lithotripsy system to laser-based lithotripsy in adult patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy were included. Results: Four studies including 260 patients were included. Trilogy lithotripsy demonstrated a statistically significant higher stone-free rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.44; p = 0.005) and higher lithotripsy rate (MD = 33.23 mm Conclusions: Despite technological advances in laser lithotripsy, dual energy lithotripsy probes with suction provide more efficient stone disintegration and superior stone-free rates in PCNL compared to laser lithotripsy without compromising safety or operative time. The combination of ultrasonic, ballistic, and suction capabilities in dual energy probes facilitates stone fragmentation and simultaneous fragment removal while reducing stone retropulsion and lowering the intra-renal pressure, contributing to improved visibility and lower risk of infectious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.