Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42904100›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

Occupational physicians' perceptions of professional role change following health policy reform in France: A qualitative study.

Babacarsy Diop, Etienne Fourreau, Bénédicte Clin, Mathilde Boulanger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Babacarsy DiopCHU Caen, Service de Santé au Travail et Pathologie Professionnelle, Caen, France.
Etienne FourreauASTER - Recherches en Santé au Travail, France.
Bénédicte ClinCHU Caen, Service de Santé au Travail et Pathologie Professionnelle, Caen, France.
Mathilde BoulangerASTER - Recherches en Santé au Travail, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To explore occupational physicians' perceptions of the 2 August 2021 reform and changes in their professional role, identify reported barriers and perceived facilitators to practice change, and describe reported health promotion practices. Study design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Methods: Ten occupational physicians practising in Normandy, France, were interviewed between November 2024 and March 2025. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis with a hybrid deductive-inductive coding approach. Results: Participants expressed contrasting perceptions of the reform, ranging from support for its objectives to concerns about feasibility and dilution of the occupational physician's specific role. Reported barriers were mainly organisational, including limited time, workload and staffing constraints. Dedicated time, additional resources, training and multidisciplinary support were described as conditions that could facilitate implementation. Participants also reported health promotion practices that predated the reform and were not always perceived as distinct public health activities. Conclusions: Among the physicians interviewed, few changes in practice were directly attributed to the reform, while several health promotion activities were reported to have predated it. The findings suggest a tension between expanded public health expectations and perceived boundaries of the occupational physician's role within an already constrained organisational context.

Indexed as

Health PromotionOccupational healthOccupational physiciansPublic health policyQualitative ResearchWorkplace health

Identifiers

PMID42904100
PMCPMC13682051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.