ArticleCentral European journal of urology2026
Surgical margins and biochemical recurrence after the introduction of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The DaVinci System is increasingly introduced in many centers worldwide, creating a need for data on surgical outcomes during the early phase of adoption. This study analyzes positive surgical margins (PSMs) and compares outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed histopathologic and clinical data from 153, 126, and 721 patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, respectively. Patients with T2-T3 disease, no lymph node or distant metastases, and no history of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were included. Additionally, surgeon-specific learning curves based on PSM rates were evaluated following the introduction of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution. Results: PSM were identified in 254 of 721 (35.2%) robot-assisted procedures, predominantly as focal margins, most often located at the apex. PSM rates were comparable between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery and higher after open prostatectomy (p = 0.002). PSM distribution was similar between robot-assisted and open approaches, while apical margins were most frequent following laparoscopic prostatectomy. PSMs were associated with a higher risk of early biochemical recurrence in the entire cohort (p = 0.003). Seminal vesicle invasion was consistently associated with early biochemical recurrence across all surgical approaches. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery were associated with a lower risk of early biochemical recurrence than open prostatectomy. Surgeon-specific analysis demonstrated heterogeneous learning curves, with a reduction in PSM rates after the initial 50-100 cases and stabilization with increasing experience. Conclusions: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy achieved PSM rates comparable to laparoscopic and lower than open prostatectomy during the early phase following its introduction. Despite more adverse pathology, robot-assisted surgery was not associated with an increased early biochemical recurrence, supporting its oncologic safety during adoption. These findings reflect the real-world learning curve associated with the implementation of robotic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.