Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903887›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia and translational medicine2026

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous rotator interval approach for simulated adhesiolysis: A proof-of-concept feasibility and anatomical safety study.

Guillermo Rodríguez-Maruri, Eduardo Álvarez-Hornia, Hatice Begum Ciftci, Iñaki Erquicia Peralt, Ugur Yener, Jose Manuel Rojo-Manaute, Alan D Kaye, Sayed Emal Wahezi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guillermo Rodríguez-MaruriDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Science, University of Deusto, Bilbao 48007, Spain.
Eduardo Álvarez-HorniaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Science, University of Deusto, Bilbao 48007, Spain.
Hatice Begum CiftciDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
Iñaki Erquicia PeraltDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid 28007, Spain.
Ugur YenerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
Jose Manuel Rojo-ManauteUnit of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, MedCare Orthopedics and Spine Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA 71103, USA.
Sayed Emal WaheziDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several key structures involved in frozen shoulder are located in the anterior shoulder capsule. While ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections and capsular hydrodilatation have demonstrated favorable outcomes through an anterior approach, percutaneous interventions aimed at mechanical adhesion release remain insufficiently investigated. This study evaluated the feasibility and anatomical safety of an ultrasound-guided simulated percutaneous adhesiolysis of the rotator interval in a cadaveric model. Methods: The procedure was performed in a single non-pathological Thiel-embalmed shoulder from a 73-year-old male body donor. Under ultrasound guidance, a 14 G intravenous catheter was advanced from an anterior cutaneous entry point into the glenohumeral joint through the superior aspect of the subscapular recess. After removal of the needle, a 1.5-mm blunt stylet was introduced through the catheter and redirected into the plane between the intra-articular long head of the biceps tendon and the overlying rotator interval capsule. Controlled proximal-distal and medial-lateral sweeping movements were performed to simulate mechanical adhesiolysis. Subsequent anatomical dissection was used to confirm the instrument path and identify any gross injury to adjacent structures. Results: The catheter and stylet could be positioned within the intended anatomical plane under ultrasound guidance and sweeping movements were feasible in both proximal-distal and medial-lateral directions, until soft resistance was encountered at surrounding anatomical boundaries. Anatomical dissection confirmed accurate capsular entry and intra-articular instrument placement. No macroscopic injury to the long head of the biceps tendon, rotator cuff tendons, or humeral head cartilage was identified. The extent of tissue mobilization was not objectively quantified due to the absence of pathological adhesions in the specimen. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided simulated rotator interval adhesiolysis using a 14 G catheter was anatomically safe and feasible in a cadaveric model. Future clinical trials in frozen shoulder patients are warranted to confirm the efficacy of this ultra-minimally invasive approach.

Indexed as

AdhesiolysisCadaveric studyChronic painFrozen shoulderMinimally invasiveRotator interval

Identifiers

PMID42903887
PMCPMC13682460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.