Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903813›Full record

ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2026

Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Cervical Cancer Outcomes in Chinese Women: A Prospective Study on Recurrence and Mortality Risks.

Yuanxin Lin, Junjun Qiu, Liwen Jiang, Shuqi Li, Yixuan Jiang, Lu Zhou, Kexin Yu, Bin Lv, Haidong Kan, Jing Cai and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuanxin LinSchool of Public Health, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education and NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Junjun QiuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai 200433, China.
Liwen JiangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai 200433, China.
Shuqi LiObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai 200433, China.
Yixuan JiangSchool of Public Health, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education and NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Lu ZhouSchool of Public Health, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education and NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Kexin YuSchool of Public Health, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education and NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Bin LvObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai 200433, China.
Haidong KanSchool of Public Health, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education and NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1871-8999
Jing CaiSchool of Public Health, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education and NHC Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-2442
Keqin HuaObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of air pollution on the prognosis of cervical cancer (CC) remains unclear. This study examined the associations of major air pollutants on recurrence and mortality among CC patients. We enrolled 3,758 women diagnosed with primary CC at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University between 2019 and 2022, following them annually until June 2024. Air pollution exposure was estimated using high-resolution spatiotemporal models based on residential addresses. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models based on the Fine-Gray approach were used to estimate the risk of recurrence, while stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of death, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and meteorological factors. Among the patients (median follow-up ∼ 3 years), 217 recurrences (5.8%) and 113 deaths (3.0%) occurred. Each interquartile range increase in fine particulate matter (PM

Indexed as

air pollutioncervical cancercohort studyenvironmental riskssurvival

Identifiers

PMID42903813
PMCPMC13681444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.