Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903628›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Clinical Outcomes and Inflammatory Biomarker Changes After Intravenous Ketamine-Lidocaine Infusion in Refractory Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.

Ivan Keser, Slavenka Straus, Denis Imamovic, Nermin Ismic, Anida Jamakosmanovic, Dinela Omic Salkic, Mia Sotonica, Mirko Mihalj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivan KeserAnesthesia and Critical Care, General Hospital "Prim. Dr. Abdulah Nakaš", Sarajevo, BIH.
Slavenka StrausClinic for Anesthesia and Reanimation, Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, BIH.
Denis ImamovicAnesthesia and Critical Care, General Hospital "Prim. Dr. Abdulah Nakaš", Sarajevo, BIH.
Nermin IsmicAnesthesia and Critical Care, General Hospital "Prim. Dr. Abdulah Nakaš", Sarajevo, BIH.
Anida JamakosmanovicAnesthesia and Critical Care, General Hospital "Prim. Dr. Abdulah Nakaš", Sarajevo, BIH.
Dinela Omic SalkicAnesthesia and Critical Care, General Hospital "Prim. Dr. Abdulah Nakaš", Sarajevo, BIH.
Mia SotonicaAnesthesia and Critical Care, General Hospital "Prim. Dr. Abdulah Nakaš", Sarajevo, BIH.
Mirko MihaljAnaesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Mostar, Mostar, BIH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRefractory neuropathic pain remains difficult to manage despite multimodal pharmacotherapy. Intravenous ketamine and lidocaine act through distinct analgesic mechanisms, but prospective data on their combined use and on potential inflammatory biomarker changes remain limited.

objectivesThe study aimed to evaluate changes in pain intensity and treatment tolerability following a single intravenous ketamine-lidocaine infusion in adults with refractory neuropathic pain and to explore the duration of perceived treatment effect, patient-reported functional outcomes, and changes in interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP).

methodsThis prospective, single-center observational pilot study included 30 adults with refractory neuropathic pain. Participants received ketamine 15 mg plus lidocaine 4 mg/kg intravenously over 30 minutes while continuing their baseline pharmacotherapy. Pain intensity was assessed using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) at baseline, immediately after infusion, and at four-week follow-up. IL-6 and CRP were measured at baseline and four weeks. Changes in NRS scores were analyzed with the Friedman test followed by Holm-adjusted Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Biomarker changes were assessed with paired tests selected according to the distribution of within-patient differences. Adverse events and exploratory patient-reported outcomes were analyzed descriptively.

resultsMean NRS pain intensity decreased from 7.93 ± 1.64 at baseline to 4.93 ± 2.23 immediately after infusion and 5.63 ± 2.58 at four weeks (Friedman χ²(2) = 35.50, p <0.001). Reductions from baseline were significant both immediately after infusion (adjusted p <0.001; r = 0.82) and at four weeks (adjusted p <0.001; r = 0.80), whereas the difference between immediate and four-week scores was not significant (adjusted p = 0.077). A pain reduction of at least 30% was achieved by 76.7% of patients immediately after infusion and 53.3% at four weeks; reductions of at least 50% occurred in 36.7% and 30.0%, respectively. A perceived treatment effect lasting at least three weeks or still ongoing at the four-week follow-up was reported by 56.7% of participants. IL-6 decreased from 4.73 ± 2.89 pg/mL to 4.14 ± 2.84 pg/mL (p = 0.086) and CRP from 5.51 ± 3.63 mg/L to 4.69 ± 3.71 mg/L (p = 0.120); neither biomarker correlated significantly with pain intensity. Seventy percent of patients reported no spontaneous post-infusion symptoms, no hallucinations occurred, and no adverse event required premature discontinuation or additional medical intervention.

conclusionsA single ketamine-lidocaine infusion was followed by a reduction in self-reported pain that remained evident at four weeks in a proportion of patients, with predominantly mild and transient reported adverse effects. Because of the uncontrolled observational design, these changes cannot be attributed specifically to the pharmacological intervention, and the biomarker findings remain exploratory. Larger controlled studies with validated outcome measures and longer follow-up are needed to determine the efficacy and durability of this approach.

Indexed as

c-reactive proteininflammatory biomarkersinterleukin-6intravenous infusionketaminelidocaineneuropathic painpain intensity

Identifiers

PMID42903628
PMCPMC13681284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.