Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903624›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Development of a centrifugation-based method for the qualitative molecular detection of

Susanna Adelaide Sechi, Chiara Stocchero, Carolina Allievi, Diego Copetti, Fabrizio Stefani, Lucia Valsecchi, Alessandra Cafiso, Chiara Bazzocchi, Maria Teresa Manfredi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susanna Adelaide SechiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Chiara StoccheroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Carolina AllieviDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Diego CopettiNational Research Council of Italy, Water Research Institute (CNR-IRSA), Brugherio Unit, Brugherio, Italy.
Fabrizio StefaniNational Research Council of Italy, Water Research Institute (CNR-IRSA), Brugherio Unit, Brugherio, Italy.
Lucia ValsecchiNational Research Council of Italy, Water Research Institute (CNR-IRSA), Brugherio Unit, Brugherio, Italy.
Alessandra CafisoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Chiara BazzocchiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Maria Teresa ManfrediDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workflow for waterborne parasites DNA detection in surface water. Screening for environmental surveillance in monitoring and resource-limited settings. Zoonotic protozoa and microsporidia are waterborne pathogens with implications for animal and human health. Their resistant stages can persist in freshwater. Standard reference methods for water analysis are often limited to specific parasites, require large water volumes, and depends on expensive equipment. Practical alternatives are needed to facilitate parasite detection in water. This study aimed to develop a pellet-based workflow to allow the DNA detection of

Indexed as

CentrifugationDNA detectionEnvironmental surveillanceSurface waterWaterborne pathogens

Identifiers

PMID42903624
PMCPMC13682023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.