ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
The multifaceted role of mesenchymal stem cells in infectious diseases: antimicrobial properties, immunomodulation and tissue repair.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents for infectious diseases owing to their antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and tissue regenerative properties. Beyond their well-established role in tissue repair, MSCs and their secretome directly influence pathogen clearance through the secretion of antimicrobial peptides, extracellular vesicles, iron-sequestration mechanisms, and modulation of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Knowledge gap: Despite extensive preclinical investigations, MSC responses are highly pathogen-dependent, with outcomes that can be beneficial, neutral, or even detrimental depending on the infectious context. The heterogeneity in MSC efficacy across different pathogens underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of their mechanisms of action and the development of strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes. Key findings: In bacterial infections, MSCs generally promote pathogen clearance and attenuate inflammation. Conversely, antiviral effects are often indirect, primarily involving the regulation of cytokine-driven immunopathology rather than direct inhibition of viral replication. Fungal and parasitic infections exhibit more complex interactions, with some pathogens exploiting MSCs as protective niches or reprogramming their immunological functions. Emerging strategies, including priming, genetic engineering, and cell-free secretome approaches, show promise in enhancing MSC efficacy. However, heterogeneity in cell source, manufacturing processes, potency, dosing, and timing remains a significant translational barrier. Conclusion: Future development of MSC-based therapies should shift from a universal, one-size-fits-all approach toward pathogen-specific, tailored cellular or cell-free products. This transition requires the establishment of standardized potency assays, optimized dosing protocols, and clinically meaningful endpoints. Adopting a pathogen-oriented framework will be essential for advancing MSCs as effective anti-infective agents, especially in the face of rising antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.