ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Rethinking networks through relatedness - a qualitative study among inpatients in forensic psychiatry.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recovery-oriented approaches in forensic psychiatry increasingly emphasize the importance of social relationships. However, research and practice have primarily approached significant relationships through a family-caregiver lens leaving less knowledge about the broader range of relationships that may be meaningful to patients. Drawing on the concept of relatedness, this study explores how forensic psychiatric inpatients understand and negotiate their networks of significant relations during long-term admission. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in two medium secure forensic psychiatric units in Denmark. Twenty-four inpatients participated in semi-structured interviews supported by sociograms, which enabled participants to map and reflect on their social networks. Data were analyzed using a combination of descriptive analysis of sociograms and reflexive thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Results: Participants described their networks as fluid and context-dependent, encompassing not only biological relatives but also peers, former partners, professionals, and symbolically or digitally mediated relations. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) temporal trajectories, highlighting how relationships were shaped by past ruptures, present functions, and future hopes; (2) forms of relational presence, including emotional and symbolic connections as well as ambivalence; and (3) relational dynamics and agency, reflecting how participants actively maintained, redefined, or distanced themselves from relationships under institutional constraints. Relationships were characterized by both significance and fragility, with participants navigating tensions between connection, burden, and self-preservation. Conclusions: The findings challenge narrow conceptions of informal caregiving in forensic psychiatry by demonstrating that patients' significant networks extend beyond family-based models. Adopting a relatedness perspective highlights the need for clinical practices that recognize diverse and patient-defined relationships, including symbolic and context-specific forms of connection. Tailoring involvement strategies to patients' own relational priorities, while remaining attentive to ambivalence and potential burden, may support more nuanced and person-centered approaches to recovery in forensic psychiatric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.