Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903587›Full record

ReviewhLife2024

Mucosal vaccine development for respiratory viral infections.

Yifan Lin, Zhenxiang Hu, Yang-Xin Fu, Hua Peng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in hLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yifan LinDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhenxiang HuLivzonBio Inc., Guangdong, China.
Yang-Xin FuDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Hua PengGuangzhou Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal vaccines have risen to prominence in the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to their ability to elicit both local antibody and tissue-resident T cell responses, affording a dual-layered defense against infection and transmission at respiratory entry sites. While intramuscular vaccines predominantly focus on systemic immunity, mucosal vaccines offer a more nuanced, site-specific approach. However, the field faces a dearth of mucosal vaccine options for respiratory diseases, starkly contrasting to the extensive array of well-characterized injectable vaccines. The unique features of mucosal surfaces necessitate specialized adjuvants and delivery systems, adding complexity to adapting injectable vaccine technologies for mucosal applications. Here, we review the recent insights into the specificities of respiratory mucosal immunology that provide a foundation for future innovations besides the emerging vaccine platforms, newly discovered adjuvants, and vaccine delivery systems, which may open promising avenues for developing mucosal vaccines targeting respiratory pathogens.

Indexed as

adjuvantsmucosal immunologyrespiratory virusesvaccine

Identifiers

PMID42903587
PMCPMC13681670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.