ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Assessing the reliability of hippocampal single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy through intra-class effect decomposition.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hippocampus is crucial for learning, memory, and stress regulation, but is vulnerable to influences that compromise its structural and metabolic integrity. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) enables in vivo quantification of hippocampal neurochemistry, yet the absolute and relative reliability of these measures has rarely been systematically evaluated. We assessed hippocampal metabolite estimates acquired with single-voxel MRS using a semi-adiabatic localization by adiabatic selective refocusing (semi-LASER) sequence at 3 T. Nineteen healthy adults (8 male; mean age = 40.9 ± 16.9 years) underwent four measurements across 2 consecutive days, with one session including an extended acquisition. Absolute reliability was quantified using within-subject coefficients of variation (CVs), and relative reliability was estimated with the Intra-Class Effect Decomposition (ICED) framework, which partitions variance into true-score, day-specific, session-specific, and residual components. Despite good spectral quality and high absolute reliability for several metabolites, relative reliability ranged from poor to good. Good relative reliability was observed only for water-referenced myo-inositol, total choline, and total creatine; no creatine-referenced metabolite reached this threshold. Increasing the number of transients increased signal-to-noise ratio but did not improve relative reliability; only creatine-referenced total N-acetylaspartate showed significant session-specific variance. Thus, high absolute reliability did not necessarily imply high relative reliability. Hippocampal MRS at 3 T may, therefore, be suitable for group-level or mean-level metabolite estimates, but appears less suitable for correlational, biomarker, or other individual-difference applications that require stable between-person differences. Methodological refinement, including improved voxel placement, motion correction, shimming, and quantification pipelines, may improve the relative reliability of hippocampal MRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.