ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Mentalizing from self and friend perspectives: Relations between inter-brain neural similarity, affective similarity and social anxiety symptoms.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social interactions are dynamic and complex, relying on tracking variation in your own and your partner's affective and mental states. Being "in-sync" neurally and building a shared consensus can mark successful social interactions. In addition, social anxiety can impact social experiences. We used a novel, naturalistic paradigm to investigate relations between inter-brain neural similarity within mentalizing regions, affective similarity, and social anxiety symptoms. Undergraduate student friend pairs (N = 34, 85% White, 65% Women) engaged in a social interaction while videos captured from their individual perspectives were recorded. Participants watched clips of the social interaction from both their own perspective (their personal view of the social interaction) and their friend's perspective (their friend's personal view of the social interaction) while fMRI data were collected. They rated their affect after each clip. Inter-brain neural similarity was computed across three conditions: 1) Same-Stimuli: both participants viewed identical visual stimuli as in a traditional neural similarity paradigm, 2) Self-Perspective: both participants viewed the clip from their own perspective like the originally experienced social interaction, and 3) Friend-Perspective: both participants viewed the clip from their friend's perspective, a novel perspective. Participants self-reported their social anxiety symptoms, and affective similarity captured affect rating concordance within dyads. In contrast to the Same-Stimuli condition, when participants viewed the clips like they originally experienced the social interaction (Self-Perspective), greater affective similarity was associated with greater inter-brain neural similarity. When participants viewed the clips from a novel perspective (Friend-Perspective), participants lower in social anxiety symptoms exhibited greater inter-brain neural similarity with greater affective similarity; whereas participants higher in social anxiety symptoms exhibited greater inter-brain neural similarity with less affective similarity. The results suggest stimuli from socially relevant perspectives, rather than identical stimuli, may reveal more nuanced brain-behavior dynamics, allowing for a better understanding of individual differences in socioemotional experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.