Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903551›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Mentalizing from self and friend perspectives: Relations between inter-brain neural similarity, affective similarity and social anxiety symptoms.

Alicia Vallorani, Kathryn A McNaughton, Marisa N Lytle, Michael N Hallquist, Elizabeth Redcay, Koraly Pérez-Edgar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alicia ValloraniDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-5690
Kathryn A McNaughtonDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3668-876X
Marisa N LytleDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Michael N HallquistDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-8038
Elizabeth RedcayDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Koraly Pérez-EdgarDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Funding

Social Attention and Mentalizing During Puberty and Risk for Social AnxietyF32MH131269 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI VALLORANI, ALICIA · 2023 to 2024
$143k
Investigating Neural and Behavioral Alignment as a Mechanism of Social Interaction Challenges in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum DisorderF31MH127781 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MCNAUGHTON, KATHRYN A · 2021 to 2023
$140k
Examining naturalistic social engagement: Using mobile eye-tracking to investigate individual differences and within-person variation in adolescent behavior, attention, and neural processingF31MH121035 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI VALLORANI, ALICIA · 2020 to 2022
$124k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH121035NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH127781NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH131269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interactions are dynamic and complex, relying on tracking variation in your own and your partner's affective and mental states. Being "in-sync" neurally and building a shared consensus can mark successful social interactions. In addition, social anxiety can impact social experiences. We used a novel, naturalistic paradigm to investigate relations between inter-brain neural similarity within mentalizing regions, affective similarity, and social anxiety symptoms. Undergraduate student friend pairs (N = 34, 85% White, 65% Women) engaged in a social interaction while videos captured from their individual perspectives were recorded. Participants watched clips of the social interaction from both their own perspective (their personal view of the social interaction) and their friend's perspective (their friend's personal view of the social interaction) while fMRI data were collected. They rated their affect after each clip. Inter-brain neural similarity was computed across three conditions: 1) Same-Stimuli: both participants viewed identical visual stimuli as in a traditional neural similarity paradigm, 2) Self-Perspective: both participants viewed the clip from their own perspective like the originally experienced social interaction, and 3) Friend-Perspective: both participants viewed the clip from their friend's perspective, a novel perspective. Participants self-reported their social anxiety symptoms, and affective similarity captured affect rating concordance within dyads. In contrast to the Same-Stimuli condition, when participants viewed the clips like they originally experienced the social interaction (Self-Perspective), greater affective similarity was associated with greater inter-brain neural similarity. When participants viewed the clips from a novel perspective (Friend-Perspective), participants lower in social anxiety symptoms exhibited greater inter-brain neural similarity with greater affective similarity; whereas participants higher in social anxiety symptoms exhibited greater inter-brain neural similarity with less affective similarity. The results suggest stimuli from socially relevant perspectives, rather than identical stimuli, may reveal more nuanced brain-behavior dynamics, allowing for a better understanding of individual differences in socioemotional experience.

Indexed as

AffectAnxietyBrainFriendsMentalizationSocial InteractionTheory of MindAdolescentAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSelf Conceptinter-brain neural similaritymentalizingnaturalistic neurosciencesocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID42903551
PMCPMC13681053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.