ArticlePain reports2026
Somatosensory phenotyping in women with persistent genital arousal disorder: a case-control study.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) is a rare and distressing condition characterized by persistent, unwanted genital arousal in the absence of sexual desire or stimulation. Persistent genital arousal disorder is increasingly recognized as a disorder of abnormal genital sensory processing, but objective neurophysiological data remain limited. Methods: We conducted an exploratory case-control study to characterize somatosensory function in women with PGAD. Thirty women with PGAD and 30 age-matched healthy controls were recruited at Leiden University Medical Center. Participants underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST) at hand and external genital sites, conditioned pain modulation, and corneal confocal microscopy. Results: Hand QST values were within normal range in both groups. In the genital region, PGAD participants showed altered thermal pain processing, with cold and heat hyperalgesia compared with controls. Mechanical pain thresholds did not differ between groups; however, PGAD participants reported higher pain intensity ratings to mechanical stimuli and showed significantly greater temporal summation of pain in genital regions. Genital dynamic mechanical allodynia occurred more frequently in PGAD participants but did not differ significantly at the group level. Conditioned pain modulation magnitude did not differ between groups and showed substantial interindividual variability. Corneal confocal microscopy abnormalities were observed in a proportion of participants in both groups without significant between-group differences. Discussion: These findings show that QST is feasible in women with PGAD and indicate that PGAD is associated with altered somatosensory processing demonstrating genital thermal hypersensitivity and central pain sensitization in a subset of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.