Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903543›Full record

ArticlePain reports2026

Somatosensory phenotyping in women with persistent genital arousal disorder: a case-control study.

Janneke van Uhm, Astrid Hamel, Albert Dahan, Marieke Niesters, Maxime Kummeling, Stephanie Both, Henk Elzevier, Monique van Velzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janneke van UhmDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0589-3229
Astrid HamelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Albert DahanMediD Consultancy Group, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-3945
Marieke NiestersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maxime KummelingDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Stephanie BothDepartment of Sexology and Psychosomatic Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk ElzevierDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9636-0200
Monique van VelzenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-6432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) is a rare and distressing condition characterized by persistent, unwanted genital arousal in the absence of sexual desire or stimulation. Persistent genital arousal disorder is increasingly recognized as a disorder of abnormal genital sensory processing, but objective neurophysiological data remain limited. Methods: We conducted an exploratory case-control study to characterize somatosensory function in women with PGAD. Thirty women with PGAD and 30 age-matched healthy controls were recruited at Leiden University Medical Center. Participants underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST) at hand and external genital sites, conditioned pain modulation, and corneal confocal microscopy. Results: Hand QST values were within normal range in both groups. In the genital region, PGAD participants showed altered thermal pain processing, with cold and heat hyperalgesia compared with controls. Mechanical pain thresholds did not differ between groups; however, PGAD participants reported higher pain intensity ratings to mechanical stimuli and showed significantly greater temporal summation of pain in genital regions. Genital dynamic mechanical allodynia occurred more frequently in PGAD participants but did not differ significantly at the group level. Conditioned pain modulation magnitude did not differ between groups and showed substantial interindividual variability. Corneal confocal microscopy abnormalities were observed in a proportion of participants in both groups without significant between-group differences. Discussion: These findings show that QST is feasible in women with PGAD and indicate that PGAD is associated with altered somatosensory processing demonstrating genital thermal hypersensitivity and central pain sensitization in a subset of patients.

Indexed as

Conditioned pain modulationPersistent genital arousal disorderPhenotypingQuantitative sensory testing

Identifiers

PMID42903543
PMCPMC13681099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.