ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
From Nutritional Epidemiology to Clinical Prediction: Interpretable Machine Learning Reveals Subtle Associations Between Dietary Antioxidant Profiles and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Older Adults.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing burden of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) among older adults underscores the need for early risk prediction based on modifiable dietary factors. In this cross-sectional study using data from the 2007-2010 and 2017-2018 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we evaluated dietary antioxidant profiles and developed an interpretable machine learning model for NMSC risk prediction. Baseline feature analysis revealed that participants with NMSC generally had higher socioeconomic status and higher oxidative balance scores (OBS), with significant differences also observed in age and race. Through feature importance ranking using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, caffeine and luteolin were identified as the most predictive dietary variables. After comparing 12 machine learning algorithms, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was selected as the final screening-oriented prediction model (AUC = 0.742). Although its overall accuracy was lower than that of several ensemble models, LDA demonstrated higher sensitivity (0.730) and favorable imbalance-aware performance, thereby mitigating the "accuracy paradox" and supporting its use for preliminary screening to identify participants with higher predicted NMSC risk. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) global explanations further confirmed that, after controlling for age as a primary risk factor, niacin and quercetin act as protective factors in the NMSC risk prediction model. In summary, this study developed an interpretable and robust machine learning model for NMSC risk prediction in older adults and provides hypothesis-generating evidence regarding the potential role of dietary antioxidant profiles in prevention-oriented strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.