ReviewEnvironmental research letters : ERL [Web site]2026
A systematic review of nature-based solutions for climate action in African cities.
Review in Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NbS), including ecosystem-based adaptation, are increasingly proposed for climate action in African cities, but the evidence base is fragmented and lacks systematic synthesis of what is being implemented, where, and how effectively. We analysed 112 studies retained from a systematic review, covering 134 urban areas across 42 countries and including 45 informal settlements. Five NbS typology classes are inductively derived including: Green spaces; Rivers, catchments and drainage systems; Coastal systems; Green buildings; and Urban agriculture and multi-use gardens. Urban green spaces dominate the evidence (49% of studies) and are the most multi-functional class. Urban agriculture and multi-use gardens are under-recognised in headline framings, named as primary in only 5% of studies but appearing in 34% of the wider intervention mix. Evidence is increasing but concentrates geographically on larger cities. Successful climate change adaptation and mitigation outcomes are reported by 72% and 27% of studies, respectively. Heat mitigation is the most frequently quantified adaptation outcome, with temperature reductions up to 12.2 °C reported in proximity to urban green and blue spaces across the continent. Qualitative evidence links urban NbS to effective coastal protection, flood risk reduction, and increased water security. Multi-stakeholder governance anchored by local actors, and meaningful community participation are consistent enablers of effective implementation. However, insufficient long-term funding and livelihood disruptions and displacement raise concerns about long-term impacts. Priority research gaps include longitudinal effectiveness monitoring, financing mechanisms for informal contexts, systematic assessment of mechanisms behind inequitable outcomes, and evidence from under-represented regions and smaller cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.