ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Anticoagulants beyond coagulation: repurposing heparin to mitigate immunothrombosis and inflammatory cascades in sepsis.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, in which inflammation, coagulation, endothelial injury, and immune dysfunction interact to drive organ failure and death. Accumulating evidence identifies immunothrombosis as a central mechanism in this process, linking neutrophil extracellular traps, platelet activation, tissue factor expression, circulating histones, and glycocalyx degradation to microvascular collapse and multiple organ dysfunction. Although heparin has traditionally been used as an anticoagulant, its highly sulfated structure also permits interactions that are independent of antithrombin. In addition to inhibiting thrombin generation, heparin can neutralize extracellular histones, interfere with HMGB1- and lipopolysaccharide-related inflammatory signaling, inhibit heparanase, preserve endothelial glycocalyx integrity, and modulate leukocyte trafficking through selectin-related pathways. Most of these non-anticoagulant actions have been demonstrated in cell systems, animal models, human endotoxemia, or diseases other than sepsis, and should therefore be read as biological plausibility rather than as an established clinical effect. The clinical literature addresses three questions that should not be conflated: routine venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill patients, anticoagulation directed at sepsis-induced coagulopathy or disseminated intravascular coagulation, and experimental immunomodulatory repurposing. The most recent meta-analysis restricted to randomized trials found no significant mortality reduction with heparin across three trials and 426 patients (risk ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.24), and the disseminated intravascular coagulation subgroup was also inconclusive. Favorable associations reported in retrospective sepsis-induced coagulopathy cohorts justify prospective phenotype-enriched trials but do not identify established responders. This review summarizes the pathophysiological rationale, mechanistic basis, current clinical evidence, and major safety considerations of heparin use in sepsis, and highlights future directions including precision phenotyping, biomarker-guided therapy, and non-anticoagulant heparin derivatives. At present no heparin preparation, salt, dose, or biomarker threshold is validated for sepsis-specific immunomodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.