Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903393›Full record

ArticleSustainability science2026

Operationalizing vulnerability and resilience interdependencies in drought risk management.

Abdullah Konak, Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan, Elisabeth Shrimpton, Michael Jacobson, Daniel Winstead, Adelaide Cassia Nardocci, Tanaya Sarmah, Eduardo Mario Mendiondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sustainability science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdullah KonakInformation Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, Berks, Reading, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6250-7825
Nazmiye Balta-OzkanFaculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.
Elisabeth ShrimptonFaculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.
Michael JacobsonDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.
Daniel WinsteadDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.
Adelaide Cassia NardocciSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tanaya SarmahFaculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.
Eduardo Mario MendiondoSão Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Droughts, exacerbated by climate change, pose increasingly complex challenges for social-ecological systems worldwide. Traditional index-based methodologies capture vulnerability and resilience at an aggregate level but often overlook the nuanced ways in which these two constructs interact. To address this gap, this study introduces the Matrix-Based Drought Indicator System (MADIS) framework that operationalizes the interdependence between vulnerability and resilience at the indicator level. By distinguishing between coping, adaptive, and transformative capacities, the MADIS framework supports a more detailed assessment of how specific resilience indicators can mitigate different vulnerability factors. Two studies, online workshops with global drought experts and collaborative workshops focusing on small-scale farming communities in Pennsylvania, demonstrate how participatory methods can be used to identify and validate these interdependencies. Findings suggest that integrating indicator-level interdependencies leads to more refined risk categorizations, facilitates stakeholder consensus, and better informs targeted policy interventions. These case studies also reveal the drawbacks and implementation challenges of the MADIS framework. Ultimately, the MADIS framework contributes to a more dynamic view of resilience and social-technical-ecological systems analysis of climate change-related risk assessment. Future work will expand upon this approach by incorporating continuous temporal feedback, additional hazard indicators, and integration with social-technical-ecological systems analysis.

Indexed as

Drought risk managementIndicator-based frameworkResilienceVulnerabilityVulnerability–resilience interdependence

Identifiers

PMID42903393
PMCPMC13680529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.