ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Tibial nerve stimulation for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery: current evidence, patient-tailored clinical positioning, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a common long-term bowel dysfunction following rectal cancer sphincter-preserving surgery, mainly manifested as defecation urgency, frequency, clustered defecation, fecal incontinence, and a feeling of incomplete evacuation, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Current treatments largely follow symptom-oriented and stepwise management principles, including dietary and behavioral adjustments, medication, pelvic floor rehabilitation, biofeedback, and transanal irrigation. However, efficacy remains unsatisfactory for patients with persistent major LARS or refractory symptoms. Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS), as a minimally invasive or non-invasive neuromodulation method, has gradually gained attention in recent years. Direct LARS-specific studies of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) suggest a potential therapeutic signal. However, the small sample sizes, inconsistent stimulation protocols, inconsistent comparative findings, and limited follow-up preclude considering PTNS an established escalation treatment. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) offers advantages such as being non-invasive, repeatable, and potentially suitable for home maintenance therapy. However, direct evidence for its use in LARS remains limited, and it cannot currently be recommended as equivalent to PTNS. This article reviews the clinical characteristics of LARS, the basis of TNS's role, research evidence for PTNS and TTNS, their clinical positioning, and future research directions, aiming to provide a reference for individualized treatment and subsequent clinical research of LARS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.