ReviewMiddle East journal of digestive diseases2026
Upadacitinib in Colonic Crohn's Disease: A Narrative Review of Mechanistic Rationale, Clinical Trial Evidence, and Real-World Outcomes.
Review in Middle East journal of digestive diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder with colonic involvement in a substantial proportion of patients, often associated with increased symptom burden and therapeutic complexity. Upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, has emerged as an effective oral therapy for moderate-to-severe CD, including patients with colonic-predominant disease. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials, post-hoc subgroup analyses, long-term extension studies, and real-world observational cohorts evaluating the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in CD with colonic involvement. Across pivotal trials, induction therapy demonstrated superior rates of clinical remission (approximately 39-50% versus 21-29% with placebo), significant endoscopic response, and rapid symptom improvement. Maintenance therapy sustained both clinical and endoscopic outcomes through one year and beyond. Real-world studies corroborate effectiveness in highly treatment-experienced populations, although heterogeneity in study design limits causal inference. The safety profile is consistent with known JAK inhibitor class effects, with infections-particularly herpes zoster-requiring appropriate risk mitigation. Pharmacogenetic predictors of response to upadacitinib remain undefined, representing an important area for future research. Overall, upadacitinib constitutes a valuable therapeutic option for patients with refractory colonic CD, while comparative effectiveness and precision-medicine strategies warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.