ArticleSustainability science2026
Perception of interconnectedness: a new typology and tools across disciplines.
Article in Sustainability science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increased awareness of human-nature interconnectedness could, according to recent global syntheses, transform the dominant unsustainable systems that threaten our shared future on this planet. We collected and synthesized evidence from the interdisciplinary body of literature on how humans perceive their interconnectedness using a systematic search and thematic coding. Our findings provide three practical additions to the literature and the science-policy interface. First, our typology of six types of interconnectedness lends structure to the interconnectedness concept. It provides an intelligible, operationalizable core of a definition that can serve as goal and guide for efforts to increase interconnectedness. Second, the wide-ranging list of benefits and associations we found can aid practitioners and researchers to understand how diverse the benefits of interconnectedness can be; this may help to broaden coalitions and build support behind the recommended practices of working to increase perceptions of interconnectedness. Finally, our Perception of Interconnectedness Toolkit compiles diverse methods that researchers have used to measure perception of interconnectedness; it provides a menu of options for researchers to adapt to their research goals and contexts. This selection of repeatable methods can help practitioners and researchers to monitor and understand current perceptions of interconnectedness, and whether and how actions (e.g., interventions) may change those perceptions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-026-01849-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.