ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Fertility and Obstetric Outcomes Among Procedural and Nonprocedural Physicians: A Call for Improved Fertility Education for Medical Students and Trainees.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most physicians are in training during the time of known fertility decline, and trainees postpone parenthood for a variety of reasons. The aim of this study is to describe differences between the experiences of proceduralists versus nonproceduralists. Methods: An 11-item anonymous survey addressing experiences with pregnancy, fertility, and assisted reproductive technology (ART) was distributed to physicians (n = 2098) at 2 academic medical centers. Results: There was a 20% (n = 423) response rate. The median age was 31 years. Of the respondents, 293 (69%) were female. Two hundred seventy-six (66%) were trainees and 154 (36%) were proceduralists. Of 293, 137 (46.8%) female respondents reported having ever been pregnant. Of those, 55 (40%) reported pregnancy or obstetric complications. The overall birth rate was 2.57 (SD 0.95) live births per woman. Proceduralists had a lower number of live births (mean [SD], 2.3 [0.93] versus 2.7 [0.94]; Conclusions: We found a high prevalence of pregnancy and obstetric complications as well as pregnancy loss, with significantly fewer live births among proceduralists versus nonproceduralists. Medical school and residency curricula should include relevant fertility data and education to allow trainees to make informed decisions regarding family planning and fertility preservation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.