ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Transspinal temporal interference stimulation enhances neuroplasticity-associated responses and facilitates motor recovery after spinal cord injury in mice.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes substantial motor impairment, driven by neuronal loss, axonal disruption, and impaired synaptic connectivity. Temporal interference (TI) stimulation is capable of modulating neural activity, but its therapeutic potential in SCI remains largely unexplored. We explored the influence of TI stimulation on functional recovery and neuroplasticity-associated responses following SCI. Methods: Thirty-two C57BL/6J mice were randomly allocated to four groups: sham, SCI, sham stimulation, and TI stimulation. Mice underwent T8 spinal cord hemisection, followed by daily TI stimulation from day 4 to day 21 post-injury. Locomotor recovery was evaluated using the Basso Mouse Scale (BMS). At 21 days after injury, neuronal-associated changes, glial responses, and neuroplasticity-associated molecular changes were assessed by immunofluorescence staining and western blot analysis. Results: Compared with sham-operated mice, SCI mice exhibited impaired locomotor function, reduced NeuN-positive neuronal density, and decreased expression of neuroplasticity-associated proteins, including GAP43, NF-L, SYN, and PSD95. In contrast, TI stimulation significantly improved BMS scores and increased NeuN-positive neuronal density, accompanied by enhanced expression of axonal growth-associated proteins (GAP43 and NF-L) and synaptic plasticity-associated markers (SYN and PSD95). Discussion: These findings indicate that TI stimulation improves functional recovery after SCI and is associated with enhanced neuroplasticity-related responses, including axonal growth-associated and synaptic plasticity-associated changes. This study provides evidence supporting TI stimulation as a promising neuromodulation strategy for promoting neuroplasticity-associated recovery processes after spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.