ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Microsurgical Training and Skill Acquisition: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Simulation in the context of microsurgical training has been explored and examined in the literature with a difference of opinion regarding the optimal model to use for the training and acquisition of microsurgical skills. In some reports, the fidelity of the live animal models offers the opportunity learn surgical as well as surgical-scenario contextualized skills that a less realistic model is unable to offer. In other publications, the skills that can be taught on lower fidelity models are equivalent and offer a more viable and feasible approach to surgical training. Methods: A systematic review of the available microsurgical simulation models was performed with a focus on the acquisition of microsurgical skills measured with validated microsurgical instruments. A meta-analysis of the subgroups was then performed to identify the optimal microsurgical training tool. Results: All training with simulation models resulted in large and statistically significant improvements in microsurgical skills across the range of groupings of microsurgical simulations. This effect was consistently identified across the different groups. Conclusions: Choosing a model to train microsurgical skills may be less important than initially thought. Across the range of living and nonliving biological models and synthetic models, the potential to improve microsurgical skills significantly is available regardless of which simulation model is chosen.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.