Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903267›Full record

ArticleSustainability science2026

Managing biodiversity in the Anthropocene: discussing the Nature Futures Framework as a tool for adaptive decision-making for nature under climate change.

Juliano Palacios-Abrantes, Renuka Badhe, Amanda Bamford, William W L Cheung, Wendy Foden, Catarina Frazão Santos, Kerry-Anne Grey, Nicola Kühn, Kristi Maciejewski, Henry McGhie and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sustainability science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Juliano Palacios-AbrantesCenter for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Renuka BadheEuropean Polar Board, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Amanda BamfordDivision of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
William W L CheungChanging Oceans Research Unit, The Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Wendy FodenGlobal Change Biology Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Catarina Frazão SantosMARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Center / ARNET-Aquatic Research Network, Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Kerry-Anne GreyGlobal Change Biology Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Nicola KühnSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kristi MaciejewskiCentre for Sustainability Transitions, School of Public Leadership, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Henry McGhieCurating Tomorrow, 40 Acuba Road, Liverpool, UK.
Guy F MidgleyGlobal Change Biology Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Izak P J SmitScientific Services, South African National Parks, Skukuza, South Africa.
Laura M PereiraCentre for Sustainability Transitions, School of Public Leadership, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-7234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation approaches to social-ecological systems have largely been informed by a framing of preserving nature for its instrumental societal benefits, often ignoring the complex relationship of humans and nature and how climate change might impact these. The Nature Futures Framework (NFF) was developed by the Task Force on scenarios and models of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services as a heuristic approach that appreciates the diverse positive values of nature and its contribution to people. In this overview, we convene a group of experts to discuss the NFF as a tool to inform management in social-ecological systems facing climate change. We focus on three illustrative case studies from the global south across a range of climate change impacts at different ecological levels. We find that the NFF can facilitate the identification of trade-offs between alternative climate adaptation pathways based on different perspectives on the values of nature they emphasize. However, we also identify challenges in adopting the NFF, including how outputs can be translated into modeling frameworks. We conclude that using the NFF to unpack diverse management options under climate change is useful, but that there are still gaps where more work needs to be done to make it fully operational. A key conclusion is that a range of multiple perspectives of people's values on nature could result in adaptive decision-making and policy that is resilient in responding to climate change impacts in social-ecological systems.

Indexed as

Climate changeNature Futures FrameworkNature’s contributions to peopleNature valuesSocial-ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID42903267
PMCPMC13680306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.