ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: Diagnostic utility of pleural tissue debris retrieved during percutaneous drainage for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion and molecular profiling.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although pleural tissue debris is occasionally encountered in the drainage systems of patients undergoing catheter or chest tube drainage, its clinical utility has not been reported. Here, we report two cases in which pleural tissue debris retrieved during catheter drainage enabled a definitive diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and molecularly guided treatment decisions. Case presentation: The first case involved a 67-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease who developed a right pleural effusion suggestive of lung cancer with pleural metastasis. Invasive procedures for tissue acquisition were required; however, biopsy was withheld because of the high risk of pneumothorax and acute exacerbation of the underlying lung disease. Tissue debris was incidentally found in the drainage system. The tissue was adequate for pathological examination and revealed lung squamous cell carcinoma without genomic alterations. Chemoimmunotherapy was initiated without further invasive procedures. The second case involved a 78-year-old woman who presented with a left pleural effusion and a brain lesion, highly suggestive of lung cancer with brain metastasis. She declined invasive diagnostic procedures; however, tissue debris was incidentally collected from the drainage bottle and diagnosed as lung adenocarcinoma. Molecular testing revealed that the tumor harbored an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L858R mutation, allowing first-line targeted therapy to be initiated without further invasive testing. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report to describe the clinical utility of pleural tissue debris for the diagnosis of MPE and its suitability for molecular profiling. Our report highlights that this previously overlooked byproduct of routine pleural drainage can provide adequate material for histopathological diagnosis, immunohistochemistry, and molecular testing in patients with MPE, particularly those for whom conventional biopsy is contraindicated or declined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.