ReviewCureus2026
Neurological and Functional Outcomes After Decompression With or Without Fusion for Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF) is an important cause of thoracic myelopathy. This systematic review evaluated neurological and functional outcomes after posterior decompression with or without fusion for TOLF and assessed perioperative safety. An electronic search of PubMed/MEDLINE was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Studies published up to December 2024 that reported adult patients undergoing posterior decompression with or without fusion for TOLF were included. Neurological recovery was assessed using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and recovery rate. Perioperative outcomes included cerebrospinal fluid leakage, blood loss, infection, and operative time. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis framework. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Ten retrospective cohort studies including 846 patients were included. Regarding the primary neurological outcomes and perioperative safety, the use of an ultrasonic osteotome reduced operative time, blood loss, and dural tear rates compared with a high-speed burr, without significant differences in long-term neurological outcomes. Dural ossification was the strongest predictor of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Regarding secondary prognostic factors, longer symptom duration, preoperative intramedullary T2 hyperintensity, and lower baseline modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were associated with poorer neurological recovery. Furthermore, a signal change ratio ≥1.54 on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and sagittal beak-type ossification were associated with unfavorable prognosis. Overall certainty of evidence was low to very low. Outcomes after surgery for TOLF are primarily determined by preoperative neurological status and magnetic resonance imaging features. These findings may help guide surgical timing and selective fusion, while operative technique appears to mainly influence perioperative safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.