ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Ultrasonic manifestations of diffuse pericardial mesothelioma masquerading as pericardial effusion: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary pericardial mesothelioma (PPM) is an exceedingly rare, highly invasive cardiac neoplasm with insidious onset and non-specific clinical symptoms. Due to the lack of typical early manifestations and effective routine diagnostic methods, PPM is often misdiagnosed and missed, resulting in delayed treatment and poor prognosis. Case presentation: A 42-year-old male presented with 6 months of recurrent chest tightness and pain, worsening over 2 months, and two prior admissions for unexplained pericardial effusion. On admission, he had tachycardia, distant heart sounds, bilateral lower extremity edema, and a 3×2 cm hard, fixed left supraclavicular lymph node. Imaging confirmed pericardial effusion with abnormal pericardial lesions. Ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis yielded only a small amount of red jelly-like material, with cytology suggesting epithelioid neoplastic cells. Supraclavicular lymph node biopsy confirmed metastatic malignant mesothelioma. Nivolumab immunotherapy showed no improvement. Pericardial tumor resection revealed diffuse, fish-flesh-like tumor invading the myocardium and great vessels. Final pathology confirmed epithelioid-type PPM. Conclusion: Patients with recurrent unexplained pericardial effusion and atypical sonographic features, such as flocculent echoes and irregular pericardial thickening, should raise suspicion for PPM. Early recognition of these signs and timely pathological confirmation are critical to avoid diagnostic delays and may improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.