Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903207›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Shared and vaccine-specific factors associated with COVID-19 and influenza vaccination intentions among adults in Poland: a COM-B-informed cross-sectional study.

Mariusz Duplaga, Magdalena Sikorska, Kinga Kowalska-Duplaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariusz DuplagaDepartment of Health Promotion and e-Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena SikorskaDepartment of Health Promotion and e-Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Kinga Kowalska-DuplagaDepartment of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Medical Faculty, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccination intentions reflect both vaccine-specific attitudes and cognitive, social, and practical conditions. This study aimed to identify shared and vaccine-specific factors associated with COVID-19 and influenza vaccination intentions among adults in Poland using a Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model-informed comparative approach and to assess the incremental contribution of vaccine hesitancy. Methods: A cross-sectional computer-assisted web survey was conducted in May 2026 among 3,000 adults recruited from a national online panel using quota controls for age, sex, education, place of residence, and macroregion. Measures included a COM-B-informed item set, the Polish Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, the short version of European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire, the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire, and sociodemographic, health-related, political, religious, and social media variables. The item set was evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in independent subsamples, followed by theory-ordered hierarchical logistic regression, Results: Intention was reported by 18.2% of respondents for COVID-19 vaccination and 31.5% for influenza vaccination. Psychometric analyses supported retention of three theory-defined COM-B domain indicators, although Capability and Opportunity showed limited empirical separation. Capability was positively associated with COVID-19 and influenza vaccination intentions (OR = 1.31 and 1.74, respectively), as was Motivation (OR = 2.64 and 1.56). Opportunity showed inverse adjusted associations (OR = 0.72 and 0.73). Vaccine hesitancy added explanatory value in both models and showed a nonlinear association with influenza intention. Political preference showed a vaccine-specific pattern: compared with supporters of Law and Justice, supporters of the far-right Confederation party had lower odds of COVID-19 vaccination intention (OR = 0.50), whereas no corresponding association was observed for influenza vaccination intention. Non-participation in the 2023 parliamentary election was associated with lower odds of both intentions. Nagelkerke Conclusion: The shared pattern across outcomes supports COM-B as an organizing framework, while the incremental contribution of hesitancy and differences in political and health-related correlates demonstrate the vaccine-specific context of vaccination intentions. COVID-19 intention remained more politically differentiated. Vaccination-promotion strategies should combine behavioral diagnosis with attention to the political context of each vaccine.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesIntentionVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOM-B modelCOVID-19 vaccinationhealth literacyinfluenza vaccinationvaccination intentionvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID42903207
PMCPMC13680461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.