ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Nutritional indicator-based prediction model for esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhosis using XGBoost and SHAP.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Malnutrition is common in cirrhotic patients and associated with poor prognosis, yet current models have suboptimal predictive performance for esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB). This study aimed to construct a noninvasive prediction model integrating nutritional indicators. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 416 cirrhotic patients (135 with EGVB, 281 without EGVB) at the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University between March 2023 and March 2025. Eight nutritional screening tools were compared by univariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify the optimal tool. An XGBoost prediction model was then constructed with permutation-importance-based feature selection. Model performance was assessed by AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score, with SHAP for interpretation. Results: Among the eight nutritional assessment tools, univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that MUST (OR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.22-1.71, Conclusion: The XGBoost-SHAP model integrating nutritional indicators accurately predicts EGVB risk in cirrhosis, outperforming single traditional nutritional screening tools. This explainable, noninvasive machine learning approach provides a reliable tool for risk stratification and individualized nutritional intervention, potentially improving outcomes in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.