ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
MSANet: a multi-scale spatiotemporal adaptive network for EEG-based driver fatigue recognition.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG)-based driver fatigue recognition remains challenging because fatigue-related patterns are distributed across multiple temporal scales, inter-channel relationships vary across samples, and inter-individual differences complicate cross-subject transfer. To address these issues, a multi-scale spatiotemporal adaptive network (MSANet) is proposed for EEG-based driver fatigue recognition. The framework introduces a multi-granularity patch temporal gate (MGPTG) to model locally continuous temporal contexts, stable graph node enhancement (SGNE) to enhance channel-node features before dynamic graph construction, and an adaptive classifier gate (ACG) to combine cosine-based and affine decision geometries. MSANet was evaluated on two public simulated-driving EEG datasets using a cross-subject transfer protocol, in which the target-subject samples were stratified with a partition ratio of 0.5 into a labeled adaptation subset and a held-out test subset. MSANet achieved an accuracy (ACC) of 83.64% and an F1-score (F1) of 83.74% on Dataset I, and 74.64% ACC and 72.92% F1 on Dataset II. The results indicate strong numerical performance on Dataset I and competitive performance on Dataset II. Subject-level statistical analysis was additionally conducted to distinguish mean performance differences from differences that are consistently supported across subjects. Ablation results showed lower mean performance after removing MGPTG, SGNE, or ACG under the evaluated settings. These findings support further evaluation of the proposed stage-specific temporal, graph-node, and classification mechanisms for cross-subject transfer in EEG-based driver fatigue recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.