Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42903074›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

The relationship between colleagues' social support and burnout: a scoping review of quantitative research.

Élodie Latour, Mathias Rossi, François Lauzier-Jobin, Roxane Rousseau, Sophie Meunier

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Élodie LatourDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mathias RossiDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
François Lauzier-JobinSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Roxane RousseauDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sophie MeunierDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social support, particularly from colleagues, is recognized as an important protective factor against burnout. However, the literature on this association is fragmented, making it difficult to draw any conclusions and orient future research. To fill this gap, this study seeks to map the extent, range and nature of the quantitative scientific literature examining the relationship between colleagues' social support and burnout. Methods: A scoping review was performed on nine databases, with a total of 154 studies included. Results: Most studies were cross-sectional, were conducted in Europe and North America and examined workers from the health and social services sector. A wide variety of questionnaires were used to measure colleagues' social support, while the majority of studies used the Maslach Burnout Inventory to measure burnout. Although there has been a significant increase in studies examining the relationship between colleagues' social support and burnout over the years, most such studies were conducted with homogeneous samples. Very few studies (7.8%) discuss aspects of diversity among the participants (e.g., gender, ethnicity). Studies also lack consistency in terms of the measurements used to assess colleagues' social support and thus the obtained results. Discussion: Further studies that use longitudinal designs, apply comprehensive and multidimensional measures of social support and focus on participants with diverse attributes (e.g., non-heterosexual participants, participants living with a mental illness) are needed to provide a more nuanced understanding of the role of colleagues' social support in burnout.

Indexed as

burnoutcolleaguesemotional exhaustionscoping reviewsocial support

Identifiers

PMID42903074
PMCPMC13680209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.