ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Time-restricted feeding during the inactive phase vs.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: In recent years, intermittent fasting has become a popular method for preventing and treating obesity and chronic diseases. This study explored the metabolic and inflammatory effects of inactive-phase (Day) time-restricted feeding (TRF) vs. Methods: Four groups (TRF + HF, TRF + S, Ad + S, Ad + HF; Results: Body weight was significantly associated with both Diet and Feeding pattern after baseline adjustment, with the greatest observed weight gain in Ad + HF and the smallest in TRF + S. TNF-α showed a significant Diet × Feeding interaction, characterized by marked reductions in both TRF groups and little change in Ad + HF. Lipid metabolism exhibited distinct interactions between diet type and feeding regimens. Total cholesterol levels increased in both Conclusions: Overall, inactive-phase time-restricted feeding was associated with lower weight gain, favorable changes in selected lipid parameters, and a reduction in TNF-α. No significant Diet × Feeding interactions were observed for IL-6 or LPS, indicating that the inflammatory findings were specific to TNF-α rather than reflective of a generalized anti-inflammatory effect. However, because food intake was not quantitatively measured, these differences cannot be attributed to meal timing independently of possible differences in total energy intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.