ReviewJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2026
Continual Learning in Medical Image Analysis: Appropriate Use and Lifecycle Governance.
Review in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AI models for medical imaging are typically trained once and deployed unchanged; however, as scanners, protocols, and patient populations continue to evolve, model performance may degrade over time. Continual learning offers a way to incorporate newly acquired data while limiting the loss of previously learned diagnostic knowledge; therefore, it is particularly suited to clinical environments in which historical images cannot be freely retained or reused. This review outlines the continual learning scenarios and methodological families most relevant to radiology, examines when continual updating is preferable to periodic retraining or simple recalibration, and summarizes the applications in classification, segmentation, detection, and multi-joint radiographic grading. It then addresses the clinical constraints that determine feasibility: privacy and regulatory limits on data retention, delayed and noisy labels, class imbalance, and evaluation requirements beyond the average accuracy. Therefore, continual learning should be implemented as a governed, auditable maintenance process rather than as a single algorithmic choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.