Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42902904›Full record

ReviewJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026

Perceptions of Dietary mHealth Apps Among Adolescents: Scoping Review.

Maria B Magro, Alysha L Deslippe, Trisha C Baluyot, Angela S Alberga, Tamara R Cohen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria B MagroDepartment of Health, Kinesiology and Clinical Exercise Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6859-1431
Alysha L DeslippeFood, Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 218-2205 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, 1-604-827-0362.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5941-3307
Trisha C BaluyotCentre of Excellence in Adolescent Severe Obesity, Department of Adolescent Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2226-9913
Angela S AlbergaDepartment of Health, Kinesiology and Clinical Exercise Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3858-9482
Tamara R CohenFood, Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 218-2205 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, 1-604-827-0362.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-9965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescents' high engagement with smartphones creates opportunities for mobile health (mHealth) apps targeting dietary behaviors. However, despite the availability of diverse dietary mHealth apps, user engagement remains low. Existing quantitative literature has identified barriers and facilitators to app effectiveness in youth (aged 10-19 years) but has not fully captured the nuanced perceptions of adolescents (aged 12-19 years), who represent a unique life stage. Synthesizing similarities and differences in adolescents' perceptions of what they value in dietary mHealth apps from qualitative studies may provide a more comprehensive understanding of app engagement and future app design. Objective: We aimed to synthesize adolescents' perceptions of using diverse dietary mHealth apps. Methods: A scoping review was conducted according to the 5-stage framework by Arksey and O'Malley. Eligible studies were published in English and reported on adolescents (aged 12-19 years) with perceptions of dietary mHealth apps using qualitative methods. Apps that were not specific to diet, relied only on SMS text messaging, were delivered as part of a school-based intervention or telemedicine service, or were housed on a website or social media platform were excluded. Five evidence sources (PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and CINAHL) were searched. Extracted data were charted by 1 researcher following a pilot test. Similarities and differences in adolescents' perceptions were synthesized across studies using thematic analysis. Results: Of the 1195 search results, 1.2% (n=14) met the eligibility criteria. We identified six themes that represented adolescents' perceptions of using dietary mHealth apps: (1) functionality and design, (2) content and depth, (3) social connection and support, (4) entertainment and gamification, (5) goal setting and motivation, and (6) perceived effectiveness. Overall, adolescents favorably perceived apps that were easy to navigate, fostered social connections, were personalizable, and were gamified. Apps that were felt to increase awareness of personal eating habits, often through tracking calories and foods consumed, and foster awareness of personal well-being were especially discussed in relation to perceived app effectiveness. Conclusions: The findings of this review provide an innovative synthesis of adolescents' perceptions of diverse dietary mHealth apps, using qualitative data. Notably, dietary mHealth apps that were perceived as easy to navigate, tailored (eg, in terms of content), and gamified and those that included social engagement were perceived favorably, regardless of their dietary target and features. Apps that were perceived to improve adolescents' current dietary awareness were particularly valued. Inclusion of these elements in dietary mHealth apps may promote greater engagement. App developers should work with adolescents to establish how specific apps can incorporate these elements into their design, including how best to track dietary habits and integrate AI into app features.

Indexed as

adolescentsdietmHealthmobile appsmobile healthnutritionscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42902904
PMCPMC13683992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.