ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Disorders of Consciousness: A Narrative Review of Potential Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Future Perspectives.
Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisorders of consciousness (DoC), including the vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) and the minimally conscious state (MCS), present a major clinical challenge due to limited therapeutic options. Trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) has recently emerged as a promising neuromodulatory intervention. MECHANISMS AND CURRENT EVIDENCE: The trigeminal nuclei send efferent fibers to the thalamus and the ascending reticular system, which then broadly innervate multiple brain areas via the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) through both direct and indirect pathways. Capitalizing on the trigeminal nerve's distinctive anatomy, TNS has been hypothesized to potentially promote consciousness recovery in preclinical models by activating specific pathways, modulating the release of key neurotransmitters (e.g., hypocretin, dopamine, and norepinephrine), and influencing cerebral hemodynamics. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving both external TNS (eTNS) and acoustic-electric TNS have highlighted a possible direction for its application as a novel therapy for DoC; the findings appear to suggest potential clinical relevance, although current evidence remains constrained by small samples, patient heterogeneity, variable stimulation protocols, and limited long-term follow-up. CHALLENGES: The clinical translation of TNS, however, faces pressing obstacles, including uncertainty regarding optimal stimulation targets and parameters, insufficient long-term safety and efficacy data, incompletely elucidated mechanisms of action, and a lack of suitable preclinical models.
conclusionsTNS may represent a promising therapeutic approach for DoC, but further high-quality studies are needed to establish its mechanisms, safety, efficacy, and optimal stimulation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.